Where to source candidate builders
The London builder market has approximately 25,000 registered companies offering domestic construction work, of which 3-5% pass standard professional vetting. Effective sourcing channels: FMB Find a Builder (Federation of Master Builders membership requires 3+ years trading, inspection, references, financial check); TrustMark Government-Endorsed Quality Scheme (independent quality assurance backed by insurance); Chartered Building Company / Chartered Building Consultancy via the CIOB; NHBC Approved Builder for warranty-backed work; architect or surveyor recommendation tied to their own professional reputation. Less effective and best avoided as sole source: Checkatrade, MyBuilder and Rated People (low entry barrier, sponsored placements, review manipulation); leaflet drops; Facebook local groups; door-knockers and 'we have leftover materials' approaches. Combine 2-3 channels for shortlist of 5-8, then apply vetting filter to land 3 for quote.
The vetting checklist
Apply the same six gates that Builderr uses for subcontractor vetting. Companies House check: limited company with 3+ years filed accounts, no recent change of company name or director, no County Court Judgments against the company in 2 years. Insurance check: request current Public Liability certificate £5m minimum and Employers Liability £10m minimum, verify with the insurer's policy number. Trade body check: confirm active membership of FMB, TrustMark, NHBC or Chartered Building Company by ringing the body, not just trusting a website logo. References: three completed projects in the last 12 months, similar in scope and budget, addresses provided, visit at least one in person, speak to the client by phone (not email), ask about variations, communication and final cost vs quote. Reviews: search Google, Trustpilot and Houzz independently, look for consistent feedback over 12+ months not a cluster of reviews in 30 days. Quote structure: fully itemised, fixed-price, no provisional sums on definable items, payment schedule tied to milestones, no upfront above 10%.
Red flags that signal a cowboy
Eight red flags reliably identify problem contractors. Quote materially below the market range (more than 15% under three other quotes) — almost always indicates missing items that will return as variations. Pressure to sign quickly or claim a 'discount expires this week' — legitimate contractors do not use sales tactics. Demand for more than 10% upfront deposit, or large material payments before works — cashflow risk on their end. Reluctance to provide insurance certificates, trade body proof or written contract — disqualifies the contractor. Vague references, no completed addresses or addresses outside London — likely fake. Trading from a residential address with no commercial premises and no office staff. No structural engineer named on the quote. Pressure to skip party wall notices, planning or building control to 'save time and money' — exposes you to legal and financial liability that the contractor will not share. Any one of these red flags justifies removing the contractor from consideration; two or more is decisive.
Contract structure for protection
Use a recognised standard contract, not a one-page quote. For projects under £100,000, the FMB Domestic Building Contract is straightforward and free for clients. For projects £100,000-£500,000, the JCT Minor Works or JCT Home Owner Contract provides robust dispute resolution and is widely understood. For projects above £500,000, JCT Intermediate Building Contract with named subcontractors and full design responsibility allocation. Key clauses to confirm: liquidated damages for late completion (typically £150-£500 per day); retention of 5% pending defects walk at 6 months; defects liability period of 12 months minimum; variation order procedure requiring written instructions; mediation and adjudication clauses before litigation; insurance obligations on both parties. Always have a solicitor review the contract for projects above £100,000; legal review costs £400-£900 and routinely saves multiples of that in averted dispute.
