When s1 applies — the three scenarios
Section 1 of the Party Wall Act 1996 applies in three distinct scenarios for building NEW walls (no existing shared structure): (1) s1(2) — building owner wishes to build a wall ASTRIDE the boundary line (i.e. partly on neighbour's land) — adjoining owner consent required for the wall to be built astride; if consent given the wall becomes a party wall + party fence wall when complete; if dissent, building owner cannot build astride + must build wholly on own land instead (the s10 dispute resolution does NOT compel astride-construction against an objecting neighbour). (2) s1(5) — building owner builds a new wall WHOLLY on their own land but wishes to place foundations under neighbour's land (typical for narrow side returns where eccentric foundations would otherwise tip the wall) — notice required, neighbour can consent or dissent, dissent triggers Award process resolving foundation rights; (3) s1(6) — building owner builds wholly on own land + has no foundations under neighbour's land — no s1 notice required, but s6 adjacent excavation notice may still apply if foundations are within 3m + below neighbour's foundation depth (commonest London scenario). Always determine scenario at design stage.
Side return extensions + boundary walls — typical London cases
Typical London side return extension: a new flank wall is needed against the boundary with the next-door neighbour. Three design routes: (a) build flank wall wholly on own land with 50–80mm clear margin from boundary — foundations also wholly on own land (deep narrow strip foundation or piled foundation needed if narrow margin) — no s1 notice required, but s6 likely required for excavation; (b) build flank wall wholly on own land but place foundations under neighbour's land for stability — s1(5) notice required, foundations only on neighbour's land + wall on own; (c) build flank wall astride boundary as a new party wall — s1(2) notice required, neighbour consent needed (commonly refused for asymmetric extensions where neighbour gets no benefit). Garden boundary wall (new build): same logic — astride = s1(2) needing consent; wholly on own land = no s1 (but may need planning if >2m). Builderr design preference for side returns: route (a) wholly on own land + deep narrow-strip or mini-piled foundations — avoids the consent dependency + gives maximum design freedom on neighbour's response.
Notice content + timing
Content (s1(3) Act): same general content as any party wall notice (see [[party-wall-notice-template-london]]) plus specific identification of (a) the proposed wall location relative to the boundary line — astride or with foundations under neighbour's land; (b) scaled drawings showing wall cross-section + foundation extent; (c) materials + construction method; (d) proposed commencement date min 1 month after service. Adjoining owner response: within 14 days written response — consent (proceed with astride-construction or under-land foundations as proposed) or dissent (triggers Award). For s1(2) astride proposals, dissent is final — building owner CANNOT build astride against dissent (must redesign wholly on own land). For s1(5) under-land foundations, dissent triggers Award process which may permit foundations on adjusted terms. Cost of notice + Award: similar to standard party wall — £185–£485 notice + £1,500–£4,500 + VAT each side if Award required. Building owner pays. Conservation Area + heritage boundary walls — coordinate with planning + LBC at design (boundary wall changes often subject to design controls separately to party wall procedural).
