PC sum mechanics
PC sum: included for items specified by category but exact model not chosen at contract date. Example: PC £4,500 for sanitary ware — basins, WC, shower, bath — exact brand selected during construction. Allows client time to make selections without delaying contract. Reconciliation at final account: actual cost replaces PC; difference adjusts contract sum. PC £4,500 actual £5,800 → contract sum +£1,300 plus typically 10–15% contractor margin on variance £130–£195. PC includes supply only — contractor labour to install is main contract. Risk: client over-specifies during selection. Mitigation: realistic mid-market PC sum; specify upper limit; require sign-off on selections vs PC budget.
Provisional sum mechanics
Provisional sum: work cannot be defined precisely at contract — scope or extent uncertain. Example: provisional £6,000 for underpinning depth only knowable post-excavation. Two types under JCT 2016: (a) Defined — scope reasonably specified, cost uncertain; contractor includes prelims and programme in main contract. (b) Undefined — scope and cost both uncertain; contractor entitled to additional prelims and programme extension when scope confirmed. Most domestic JCT use defined. Reconciliation: actual work substitutes provisional sum; contractor entitled to margin (7.5–15%) plus reasonable prelims. Provisional £6,000 actual £9,200 → +£3,200 plus margin £240–£480 plus prelim extension. Higher-risk than PC sums.
When to use each
PC sums appropriate for: sanitary ware, lighting, kitchen appliances, ironmongery, decorating finishes — selection needs client showrooms but install method standard. NOT appropriate for: structural works, services first-fix, specialist trades — need full design before contract. Provisional sums appropriate for: unknown ground conditions (foundations, drainage), specialist surveys incomplete (asbestos abatement TBC), exploratory opening up (electrical rewire scope), heritage discoveries. NOT appropriate for: standard works where scope is knowable — should be measured into main contract. Red flag: contracts with >15% provisional sums signal incomplete design and high variation risk.
Reconciliation and disputes
Final account reconciles PC and provisional sums to actual cost. Process: contractor submits supplier invoices for PC items and time-sheets/measurements for provisional sums; QS verifies; net adjustment to contract sum; agreed VO. Disputes: contractor claims £8,500 for provisional £6,000 underpinning citing additional depth; client disputes citing scope was clear. Resolution: site investigation report, engineer variation, documented evidence; if unresolved, JCT adjudication. Minimise disputes: realistic PC sums, complete surveys pre-contract, contractor must allow client to challenge cost before commitment, ceiling on provisional sums above which client re-approves.
