Skip to content
Projects
AnswersInsights
Get a Quote
020 7864 7245WhatsApp
Enfield · N13 · 2025

Prior approval open-plan rear extension

Enfield · 1930s semi-detached · N13 · 10-week build

Project cost
£88,000
Site programme
10 wks
Type
House Extension
Year
2025

Free · No obligation

Get your free quote

A senior consultant calls within one business hour.

No spam. Your details are never sold.

Brief

A 1930s semi-detached house in Palmers Green — the clients wanted a large open-plan kitchen-diner to replace a narrow galley kitchen and cramped rear reception. At 5.5m depth, the extension qualified for Prior Approval under Class A (Larger Home Extension) rather than full planning permission, saving both time and cost.

Challenge

Prior Approval Class A (introduced under the 2013 amended GPDO, extended in 2020 to make the larger-home-extension PD right permanent) allows single-storey rear extensions up to 6m on semi-detached and terraced houses — but requires a neighbour consultation scheme administered by the local authority. Enfield notified both immediate neighbours. One neighbour raised a concern: potential overshadowing to their rear garden seating area. Enfield's case officer requested a sun-path analysis before determining the application. Without one, prior approval would have defaulted to refusal.

Solution

Builderr commissioned a BS 8206-2 daylight and sunlight assessment from a specialist consultant (£650, 5-day turnaround). The report confirmed the proposed extension at 5.5m × 6m (33m²) would reduce the neighbour's rear garden solar access by less than the 2-hour threshold below the BRE 209 guide for a September 21 analysis day. This was submitted to Enfield's case officer, who confirmed the objection could not be sustained as a material planning consideration. Prior approval was granted on day 38 (within the 42-day statutory determination period). Build commenced 7 days later.

Outcome

33m² open-plan kitchen-diner-living zone replacing a 9m² galley kitchen and 11m² rear reception. Layout: kitchen along north wall, central island, dining to south under roof lantern, living zone with bifold to garden. Specification: 3.2m × 2.4m three-panel aluminium bifold (Schuco ADS 75), 1.2m × 2.4m roof lantern, UFH screed (150mm, 100W/m²), Amtico Spacia LVT over UFH. External finish: grey through-colour render to match existing bay render, flat EPDM roof. Building Regulations: Building Notice (not full plans) — appropriate for a straightforward single-storey rear extension, building inspector signed off at completion. Programme 10 weeks from prior approval grant to sign-off.

Spec

Project specification.

Build
5.5m × 6m single-storey rear extension (33m²)
Route
Prior Approval Class A (Larger Home Extension) — no full planning required
Determination
Granted day 38 of 42-day neighbour consultation period
Objection
Sunlight concern resolved via BS 8206-2 daylight assessment (BRE 209 threshold met)
Glazing
Schuco ADS 75 three-panel bifold (3.2m × 2.4m) + 1.2m × 2.4m roof lantern
Heating
UFH screed 100W/m²; connected to existing combi boiler
Building regs
Building Notice route — inspector signed off at completion
Programme
10 weeks build (following 38-day prior approval determination)

Gallery

Inside the build.

1930s semi-detached house Palmers Green N13
1930s semi — prior approval under Class A (larger home extension) avoids full planning
Open-plan kitchen-diner extension interior
33m² kitchen-diner-living with UFH and three-panel bifold to garden
Rear extension roof lantern and dining area
1.2m × 2.4m roof lantern floods the dining area with natural light

"Our neighbour's objection worried us — we thought we'd end up in a full planning battle. Builderr sorted the sunlight report in five days and prior approval came through on time. We were in the kitchen extension before Christmas."

— Sandra and Paul Fletcher, Palmers Green N13

Compare

Builderr vs other London builders.

The construction industry has a wide distribution of operators. Here's what changes between a directly-employed, fixed-scope outfit and the alternatives.

Builderr fixed price
£88,000
a house extension · no provisional sums
Typical builder + variations
£105,600
+£17,600 vs Builderr (≈20% overrun)
Cowboy outfit + cost creep
£127,600
+£39,600 vs Builderr (≈45% overrun)
CriterionBuilderrTypical London builderCowboy outfit
Labour modelDirectly employed team (PAYE)Mixed subcontract gangsDay-rate cash labour
PricingFixed-scope itemised quoteEstimate + provisional sumsVerbal price + variations
Design & engineeringIn-house architect + SEOutsourced, separate billingBuilder draws on the back of an envelope
Planning + LDC handledYes — included in priceOften charged extraBuilder asks you to apply
Party wall surveyorsInstructed by usYour responsibilitySkipped (illegal)
Building controlPlans + site inspections booked by usBuilding Notice routeNot registered
Project managementDedicated PM, weekly photo updatesForeman doubles upOwner-manager juggles 5 jobs
Payment scheduleStage payments against signed-off milestonesWeekly invoicesCash up front
Insurance£10M PL + 10yr structural warranty£2–5M PL onlyNo documented cover
Snags at handover<3 typical20–30 typicalWalk-off mid-job common
Variation creep0% — fixed scope+15–25% over original quote+40%+ regularly
Bottom line

Save £17,600–£39,600 on a house extension.

Industry data (FMB, RICS, Which? Trusted Trader 2024) shows the average London construction project overruns by 18–22% on cost and 25–35% on time. Fixed-scope contracts with a single accountable team eliminate that variance. The savings above assume a typical project at £88,000.

Want a build like Enfield?

Get a fixed-scope quote with the same direct-labour delivery. Senior consultant call within one business hour.

Related services