Skip to content
ProjectsCost GuidesGuidesAnswersInsightsAbout
Get a Quote
Redbridge · IG3 · 2026

Double-storey rear extension, Seven Kings

Redbridge · 1952 semi-detached · IG3 · 14-week build

Project cost
£108,000
Site programme
14 wks
Type
House Extension
Year
2026

Brief

A 1952 post-war semi-detached in Seven Kings, Redbridge — IG3, no conservation area, original PD rights intact. The property: 82m², three bedrooms, one bathroom, a compact 12m² kitchen at the rear with a window looking onto a generous 14m-deep garden. The clients — a professional couple with a toddler — needed a fourth bedroom, a family-scale kitchen, and a utility room, all without disrupting the three existing bedrooms on the first floor.

Challenge

The rear garden depth (14m) gave room for a deep extension, but the client's preferred depth of 5.5m triggered the need for a full planning application under the Prior Approval route (the Larger Home Extension Scheme allows up to 6m for semi-detached under Prior Approval, but Redbridge Planning required full planning for the proposed depth given the site geometry and relationship with the rear boundary). The planning officer's initial feedback was that the extension was 'overbearing' relative to the rear neighbours — the rear boundary was only 8.5m from the proposed new rear wall of the extension. Architect revised the scheme: the first-floor addition was set back 1.5m from the full-depth ground floor (creating a first-floor footprint of 4m × 4m over a ground floor footprint of 5.5m × 4m) — this stepped massing reduced the visual impact to rear neighbours and satisfied the planning officer's concerns. Party Wall: Section 6 notice served to left and right neighbours (foundation excavation within 3m of their foundations); both used the Agreed Surveyor route; Awards sealed in 5 weeks.

Solution

Revised massing: ground floor 5.5m × 4m (22m²) with full-width sliding glass wall to garden; first floor 4m × 4m (16m²) with Juliet balcony to rear — the stepped massing creates a roof terrace on the ground-floor flat roof (covered with EPDM and a decking platform, accessed via the Juliet balcony doors). Full planning permission: granted at 9 weeks with no amendments after the massing revision. Structural: the first-floor addition bears on the extended ground-floor masonry — a 178mm × 102mm channel section steel ties the first-floor addition back to the existing first floor of the host property. Foundation: 450mm wide strip footings at 0.9m depth on London Clay. Ground floor: kitchen-diner (24m² — 5.5m × 4m, open to existing dining room via new 2.4m steel-lintel opening); sliding glass wall (3.6m × 2.1m, aluminium, anthracite grey, Schüco ASS 70 FD) to south-facing garden. First floor: new bedroom (15m²) with Juliet balcony; en-suite shower room (4m²); both accessed off new landing extension. Roof terrace: 22m² of first-floor flat roof converted to accessible terrace (EPDM waterproofing, composite decking, 1.1m-high glass balustrade — balustrade requires planning permission, included in the main planning application). EV charger: 7kW Hypervolt installed to existing garage (separate garage to rear, accessed via side passage); SWA cable run 18m under the garden from the consumer unit.

Outcome

Floor area added: 38m² (22m² ground floor kitchen-diner + 16m² first-floor bedroom and en-suite). Property: 82m² to 120m² — a 46% increase. Bedroom count: 3 to 4. Roof terrace: 22m² accessible — rare for a post-war semi in this part of Redbridge; the terrace is directly accessible from the master bedroom via the Juliet balcony. EPC: unchanged at D (64) — extension built to current Part L standards; host property retains 1950s solid-wall construction (cavity wall insulation not installed in original construction period; cavity fill survey recommended). Build 14 weeks, within programme. Redbridge Building Control completion certificate issued at week 15.

Spec

Project specification.

Extension type
Double-storey rear — ground floor 5.5m × 4m; first floor 4m × 4m (stepped massing)
Floor area
38m² — kitchen-diner (GF) + bedroom + en-suite (FF)
Roof terrace
22m² accessible terrace on first-floor flat roof — composite decking, glass balustrade
Sliding glass
3.6m × 2.1m Schüco ASS 70 FD, anthracite grey — south elevation to garden
Planning
Full planning (5.5m depth + stepped massing) — granted 9 weeks, no amendments
Party Wall
S.6 notices to both neighbours; Agreed Surveyor; Awards sealed 5 weeks
Programme
14 weeks build, 22 weeks total

Gallery

Inside the build.

Double storey rear extension 1952 semi Seven Kings IG3 Redbridge
Double-storey rear addition to a 1952 post-war semi in Seven Kings — planning permission granted under full planning (5.5m depth triggers full application)
Open plan kitchen diner rear extension Redbridge IG3
Ground floor: 24m² open-plan kitchen-diner with 3.6m sliding glass wall to garden
New bedroom en-suite first floor rear extension Seven Kings
First floor: new bedroom (15m²) and en-suite — freed an existing bedroom for a dedicated home office

"The roof terrace was a bonus we didn't expect — the planning architect suggested it when redesigning the massing and it's become the best feature of the house. Redbridge planning was straightforward once we revised the design. The kitchen is unrecognisable."

Aisha and Daniel Osei, Seven Kings IG3

Compare

Builderr vs other London builders.

The construction industry has a wide distribution of operators. Here's what changes between a directly-employed, fixed-scope outfit and the alternatives.

Builderr fixed price
£108,000
a house extension · no provisional sums
Typical builder + variations
£129,600
+£21,600 vs Builderr (≈20% overrun)
Cowboy outfit + cost creep
£156,600
+£48,600 vs Builderr (≈45% overrun)
CriterionBuilderrTypical London builderCowboy outfit
Labour modelDirectly employed team (PAYE)Mixed subcontract gangsDay-rate cash labour
PricingFixed-scope itemised quoteEstimate + provisional sumsVerbal price + variations
Design & engineeringIn-house architect + SEOutsourced, separate billingBuilder draws on the back of an envelope
Planning + LDC handledYes — included in priceOften charged extraBuilder asks you to apply
Party wall surveyorsInstructed by usYour responsibilitySkipped (illegal)
Building controlPlans + site inspections booked by usBuilding Notice routeNot registered
Project managementDedicated PM, weekly photo updatesForeman doubles upOwner-manager juggles 5 jobs
Payment scheduleStage payments against signed-off milestonesWeekly invoicesCash up front
Insurance£10M PL + 10yr structural warranty£2–5M PL onlyNo documented cover
Snags at handover<3 typical20–30 typicalWalk-off mid-job common
Variation creep0% — fixed scope+15–25% over original quote+40%+ regularly
Bottom line

Save £21,600£48,600 on a house extension.

Industry data (FMB, RICS, Which? Trusted Trader 2024) shows the average London construction project overruns by 18–22% on cost and 25–35% on time. Fixed-scope contracts with a single accountable team eliminate that variance. The savings above assume a typical project at £108,000.

Want a build like Redbridge?

Get a fixed-scope quote with the same direct-labour delivery. Senior consultant call within one business hour.