Double-storey rear extension, Seven Kings
Redbridge · 1952 semi-detached · IG3 · 14-week build
Brief
A 1952 post-war semi-detached in Seven Kings, Redbridge — IG3, no conservation area, original PD rights intact. The property: 82m², three bedrooms, one bathroom, a compact 12m² kitchen at the rear with a window looking onto a generous 14m-deep garden. The clients — a professional couple with a toddler — needed a fourth bedroom, a family-scale kitchen, and a utility room, all without disrupting the three existing bedrooms on the first floor.
Challenge
The rear garden depth (14m) gave room for a deep extension, but the client's preferred depth of 5.5m triggered the need for a full planning application under the Prior Approval route (the Larger Home Extension Scheme allows up to 6m for semi-detached under Prior Approval, but Redbridge Planning required full planning for the proposed depth given the site geometry and relationship with the rear boundary). The planning officer's initial feedback was that the extension was 'overbearing' relative to the rear neighbours — the rear boundary was only 8.5m from the proposed new rear wall of the extension. Architect revised the scheme: the first-floor addition was set back 1.5m from the full-depth ground floor (creating a first-floor footprint of 4m × 4m over a ground floor footprint of 5.5m × 4m) — this stepped massing reduced the visual impact to rear neighbours and satisfied the planning officer's concerns. Party Wall: Section 6 notice served to left and right neighbours (foundation excavation within 3m of their foundations); both used the Agreed Surveyor route; Awards sealed in 5 weeks.
Solution
Revised massing: ground floor 5.5m × 4m (22m²) with full-width sliding glass wall to garden; first floor 4m × 4m (16m²) with Juliet balcony to rear — the stepped massing creates a roof terrace on the ground-floor flat roof (covered with EPDM and a decking platform, accessed via the Juliet balcony doors). Full planning permission: granted at 9 weeks with no amendments after the massing revision. Structural: the first-floor addition bears on the extended ground-floor masonry — a 178mm × 102mm channel section steel ties the first-floor addition back to the existing first floor of the host property. Foundation: 450mm wide strip footings at 0.9m depth on London Clay. Ground floor: kitchen-diner (24m² — 5.5m × 4m, open to existing dining room via new 2.4m steel-lintel opening); sliding glass wall (3.6m × 2.1m, aluminium, anthracite grey, Schüco ASS 70 FD) to south-facing garden. First floor: new bedroom (15m²) with Juliet balcony; en-suite shower room (4m²); both accessed off new landing extension. Roof terrace: 22m² of first-floor flat roof converted to accessible terrace (EPDM waterproofing, composite decking, 1.1m-high glass balustrade — balustrade requires planning permission, included in the main planning application). EV charger: 7kW Hypervolt installed to existing garage (separate garage to rear, accessed via side passage); SWA cable run 18m under the garden from the consumer unit.
Outcome
Floor area added: 38m² (22m² ground floor kitchen-diner + 16m² first-floor bedroom and en-suite). Property: 82m² to 120m² — a 46% increase. Bedroom count: 3 to 4. Roof terrace: 22m² accessible — rare for a post-war semi in this part of Redbridge; the terrace is directly accessible from the master bedroom via the Juliet balcony. EPC: unchanged at D (64) — extension built to current Part L standards; host property retains 1950s solid-wall construction (cavity wall insulation not installed in original construction period; cavity fill survey recommended). Build 14 weeks, within programme. Redbridge Building Control completion certificate issued at week 15.
Spec
Project specification.
Gallery
Inside the build.
"The roof terrace was a bonus we didn't expect — the planning architect suggested it when redesigning the massing and it's become the best feature of the house. Redbridge planning was straightforward once we revised the design. The kitchen is unrecognisable."
— Aisha and Daniel Osei, Seven Kings IG3
Builderr vs other London builders.
The construction industry has a wide distribution of operators. Here's what changes between a directly-employed, fixed-scope outfit and the alternatives.
| Criterion | Builderr | Typical London builder | Cowboy outfit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour model | Directly employed team (PAYE) | Mixed subcontract gangs | Day-rate cash labour |
| Pricing | Fixed-scope itemised quote | Estimate + provisional sums | Verbal price + variations |
| Design & engineering | In-house architect + SE | Outsourced, separate billing | Builder draws on the back of an envelope |
| Planning + LDC handled | Yes — included in price | Often charged extra | Builder asks you to apply |
| Party wall surveyors | Instructed by us | Your responsibility | Skipped (illegal) |
| Building control | Plans + site inspections booked by us | Building Notice route | Not registered |
| Project management | Dedicated PM, weekly photo updates | Foreman doubles up | Owner-manager juggles 5 jobs |
| Payment schedule | Stage payments against signed-off milestones | Weekly invoices | Cash up front |
| Insurance | £10M PL + 10yr structural warranty | £2–5M PL only | No documented cover |
| Snags at handover | <3 typical | 20–30 typical | Walk-off mid-job common |
| Variation creep | 0% — fixed scope | +15–25% over original quote | +40%+ regularly |
Save £21,600–£48,600 on a house extension.
Industry data (FMB, RICS, Which? Trusted Trader 2024) shows the average London construction project overruns by 18–22% on cost and 25–35% on time. Fixed-scope contracts with a single accountable team eliminate that variance. The savings above assume a typical project at £108,000.
Want a build like Redbridge?
Get a fixed-scope quote with the same direct-labour delivery. Senior consultant call within one business hour.

Related services
More projects